linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 05/13] decnet: Apply rcu_access

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 9 Oct 2013 16:57:08 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
	laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
	niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
	rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
	darren@...art.com, fweisbec@...il.com, sbw@....edu,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>, Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
	linux-decnet-user@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 05/13] decnet: Apply rcu_access_pointer()
 to avoid sparse false positive

On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 03:57:16PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 03:46:04PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 03:28:42PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 02:29:38PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > > > 
> > > > The sparse checking for rcu_assign_pointer() was recently upgraded
> > > > to reject non-__kernel address spaces.  This also rejects __rcu,
> > > > which is almost always the right thing to do.  However, the use in
> > > > dn_insert_route() is legitimate: It is assigning a pointer to an element
> > > 
> > > Nit: "uses ... are", not "use ... is". :)
> > 
> > Don't I already have "use ... is"?
> 
> I was suggesting that it needed to change from "use ... is" to "uses ...
> are", not the other way around.

I guess there really are two uses rather than just one.  ;-)

							Thanx, Paul

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/