[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <5254DD64.4090205@samsung.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 13:36:52 +0900
From: "sangjung.woo" <sangjung.woo@...sung.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Alessandro Rubini <rubini@...dd.com>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sangjung.woo@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: pl030: Use devm_kzalloc() instead of kmalloc()
On 10/09/2013 01:07 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-10-09 at 13:00 +0900, Sangjung Woo wrote:
>> In order to be free automatically and make the cleanup paths more
>> simple, use devm_kzalloc() instead of kzalloc().
> []
>> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-pl030.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-pl030.c
> []
>> @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ static int pl030_probe(struct amba_device *dev, const struct amba_id *id)
>> if (ret)
>> goto err_req;
>>
>> - rtc = kmalloc(sizeof(*rtc), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + rtc = devm_kzalloc(&dev->dev, sizeof(*rtc), GFP_KERNEL);
First of all, thanks for your review.
> You're not deleting a memset and you're
> converting a kmalloc.
You are right.
>
> Why do you need the zalloc version?
>
The key point of this patch is resource-managed memory allocation.
As you already know, memory space that is allocated by devm_kzalloc()
function
is automatically freed on driver detach. That makes the code tidy and
reduces human's mistakes not to kfree().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists