lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:36:46 +0100
From:	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To:	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
Cc:	"broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
	"lgirdwood@...il.com" <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	"sbkim73@...sung.com" <sbkim73@...sung.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	YoungJun Cho <yj44.cho@...sung.com>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: s5m8767: Modify parsing method of the
 voltage table of buck2/3/4

On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 02:41:36AM +0100, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> The s5m8767 regulator driver parse always the voltage table of buck2/3/4.
> If gpio_dvs feature isn't used and dts haven't included the voltage table
> of buck2/3/4, s5m8767 regulator driver return error and file probe state.
> 
> This patch check only voltage table of buck on s5m8767_pmic_dt_parse_pdata()
> if buck[2-4]_gpiodvs is true.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
> Signed-off-by: YoungJun Cho <yj44.cho@...sung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
> ---
>  drivers/regulator/s5m8767.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/s5m8767.c b/drivers/regulator/s5m8767.c
> index cb6cdb3..29999c0 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/s5m8767.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/s5m8767.c
> @@ -522,7 +522,7 @@ static int s5m8767_pmic_dt_parse_pdata(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  	struct device_node *pmic_np, *regulators_np, *reg_np;
>  	struct sec_regulator_data *rdata;
>  	struct sec_opmode_data *rmode;
> -	unsigned int i, dvs_voltage_nr = 1, ret;
> +	unsigned int i, dvs_voltage_nr = 8, ret;
>  
>  	pmic_np = iodev->dev->of_node;
>  	if (!pmic_np) {
> @@ -586,15 +586,39 @@ static int s5m8767_pmic_dt_parse_pdata(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  		rmode++;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (of_get_property(pmic_np, "s5m8767,pmic-buck2-uses-gpio-dvs", NULL))
> +	if (of_get_property(pmic_np, "s5m8767,pmic-buck2-uses-gpio-dvs", NULL)) {
>  		pdata->buck2_gpiodvs = true;

As this line is being changed, please switch to of_property_read_bool.

>  
> -	if (of_get_property(pmic_np, "s5m8767,pmic-buck3-uses-gpio-dvs", NULL))
> +		if (of_property_read_u32_array(pmic_np,
> +				"s5m8767,pmic-buck2-dvs-voltage",
> +				pdata->buck2_voltage, dvs_voltage_nr)) {

Won't this break existing (not conforming to the binding) dts?

$(git grep s5m8767,pmic-buck2-dvs-voltage) shows me
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts is only has one entry in its
s5m8767,pmic-buck3-uses-gpio-dvs property's list.

> +			dev_err(iodev->dev, "buck2 voltages not specified\n");
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	if (of_get_property(pmic_np, "s5m8767,pmic-buck3-uses-gpio-dvs", NULL)) {
>  		pdata->buck3_gpiodvs = true;

Another of_proeprty_read_bool candidate.

>  
> -	if (of_get_property(pmic_np, "s5m8767,pmic-buck4-uses-gpio-dvs", NULL))
> +		if (of_property_read_u32_array(pmic_np,
> +				"s5m8767,pmic-buck3-dvs-voltage",
> +				pdata->buck3_voltage, dvs_voltage_nr)) {
> +			dev_err(iodev->dev, "buck3 voltages not specified\n");
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	if (of_get_property(pmic_np, "s5m8767,pmic-buck4-uses-gpio-dvs", NULL)) {
>  		pdata->buck4_gpiodvs = true;

Similarly.

In general I'm confused by the need for the *-uses-gpio-dvs properties.
Are they not implied by the presence of *-dvs-voltage properties?

Cheers,
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ