lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 10 Oct 2013 18:35:42 +0530
From:	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...aro.org>
CC:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Issue seen with FET re-enable during auto discharge time

Hi Mark,
In one of our system, we are using TPS65090 which has FET switches for  
power control. This has also the auto discharger resistance for turning 
-off.

We observed that when we disable the FET and re-enable before it 
completely off (during power discharge time), it does not get enabled. 
It enable only if wait for it to completely off.

Does this mean we should also provide the disable time for tuning off 
(optional) so that disable_regulator() should return after actually 
tuning off?
In downstream, we stressed this after putting delay and it worked fine.


Thanks,
Laxman

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ