[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 18:41:15 +0530
From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
CC: "rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
"pawel.moll@....com" <pawel.moll@....com>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"swarren@...dotorg.org" <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
"cw00.choi@...sung.com" <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
"ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk" <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
"rob@...dley.net" <rob@...dley.net>,
"myungjoo.ham@...sung.com" <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
"gg@...mlogic.co.uk" <gg@...mlogic.co.uk>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] extcon: palmas: Added a new compatible type *ti,palmas-usb-vid*
On Thursday 10 October 2013 06:07 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> The Palmas device contains only a USB VBUS-ID detector, so added a
> compatible type *ti,palmas-usb-vid*. Didn't remove the existing compatible
> types for backward compatibility.
>
I dont have much issue on this nomenclature but just second thought:
The Palmas USB module is capable of detection VBUS, ID-GND, ID-RA,
ID-RB, ID-RC and ID-FLOAT as per BC1.2.
This sub-module only detect the cable, does nothing more than this.
In this case, should we say "ti,palmas-usb-extcon"?
Again extcon is linux specific terminology and this can be defer.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists