lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 10 Oct 2013 10:23:19 -0500
From:	Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
To:	Bhushan Bharat-R65777 <R65777@...escale.com>
CC:	Wood Scott-B07421 <B07421@...escale.com>,
	Yoder Stuart-B08248 <B08248@...escale.com>,
	Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@...aro.org>,
	Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"a.motakis@...tualopensystems.com" <a.motakis@...tualopensystems.com>,
	"agraf@...e.de" <agraf@...e.de>,
	Sethi Varun-B16395 <B16395@...escale.com>,
	"peter.maydell@...aro.org" <peter.maydell@...aro.org>,
	"santosh.shukla@...aro.org" <santosh.shukla@...aro.org>,
	"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: (re-)binding the VFIO platform driver to a platform device

On Thu, 2013-10-10 at 02:45 -0500, Bhushan Bharat-R65777 wrote:
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wood Scott-B07421
> > Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 1:33 AM
> > To: Yoder Stuart-B08248
> > Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; Kim Phillips; Christoffer Dall; Alex Williamson; linux-
> > kernel@...r.kernel.org; a.motakis@...tualopensystems.com; agraf@...e.de; Sethi
> > Varun-B16395; Bhushan Bharat-R65777; peter.maydell@...aro.org;
> > santosh.shukla@...aro.org; kvm@...r.kernel.org; gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
> > Subject: Re: RFC: (re-)binding the VFIO platform driver to a platform device
> > 
> > On Wed, 2013-10-09 at 14:44 -0500, Yoder Stuart-B08248 wrote:
> > > Ah, think I understand now...yes that works as well, and would be
> > > less intrustive.   So are you writing a patch? :)
> > 
> > I've been meaning to since the previous round of discussion, but I've been busy.
> > Would someone else be able to test it in the context of using it for VFIO?
> 
> I wish I could have but I do not have vfio-platform stuff. 

VFIO PCI without new_id would also be a useful test.

-Scott



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ