[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 19:45:21 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/efi: Add EFI framebuffer earlyprintk support
* Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 07:28:44PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > Is a non-32-bit framebuffer a possibility? If yes then it might be nice to
> > emit an informative printk() here, so that users who try to enable EFI
> > early-printk can at least see why it's not working. (Assuming they get to
> > look at regular printk output, on a safe/working kernel.)
>
> Not really - the spec allows RGBx, BGRx, and for custom bit masks, but
> they're define like:
>
> typedef struct {
> UINT32 RedMask;
> UINT32 GreenMask;
> UINT32 BlueMask;
> UINT32 ReservedMask;
> } EFI_PIXEL_BITMASK;
Hm, that structure does not show up anywhere in the kernel that I can see.
How are those mask values to be interpreted? As regular bitmasks? Are bits
in the masks set to 1 consecutively, starting from bit 0?
Also, the main question would be, what is the typical value for
si->lfb_depth. 32 on almost all EFI systems? All around the map? Depends
on what graphics state the EFI bootloader passes us?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists