[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 12:27:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com
To: "Guenter Roeck" <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: "David Cohen" <david.a.cohen@...ux.intel.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
"Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan"
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/10] intel_mid: Moved board related code to a new
file
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 11:00:06PM -0700, David Cohen wrote:
>> From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
>> <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
>>
>> +# I2C Devices
>> +obj-$(subst m,y,$(CONFIG_SENSORS_EMC1403)) += platform_emc1403.o
>> +obj-$(subst m,y,$(CONFIG_SENSORS_LIS3LV02D)) += platform_lis331.o
>
> I am a bit confused by the platform data for the above i2c devices.
> The driver for EMC1403 does supports neither interrupts nor platform data.
> The driver for LIS3LV02D supports both, but the platform data does not
> seem to match what is provided here. Am I missing something ?
I did not add anything new here. I just moved the code from mrst.c to the
respective platform data files. I am not sure whether the driver uses this
data or not. If this code needs to be fixed , we can probably do it in a
different patch.
>
>> +obj-$(subst m,y,$(CONFIG_GPIO_PCA953X)) += platform_max7315.o
>> +obj-$(subst m,y,$(CONFIG_SENSORS_MPU3050)) += platform_mpu3050.o
>
> Do you possibly mean CONFIG_INPUT_MPU3050 ?
Thanks for pointing it. I will fix it in next patchset.
>
> Guenter
>
Sathya
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists