lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131011183341.GM3041@lukather>
Date:	Fri, 11 Oct 2013 20:33:41 +0200
From:	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Emilio Lopez <emilio@...pez.com.ar>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kevin.z.m.zh@...il.com,
	sunny@...winnertech.com, shuge@...winnertech.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] clocksource: Add Allwinner SoCs HS timers driver

Hi Stephen,

On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 03:46:11PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 10/10/13 12:13, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 04:16:14PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >> On 09/25/13 07:03, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> >>> +	sun5i_clockevent.cpumask = cpumask_of(0);
> >> Can this timer interrupt any CPU or is it hardwired to CPU0? If the
> >> interrupt can go to any CPU this should be cpu_possible_mask instead.
> > I've changed the few other things you spotted, but this one making the
> > timer unusable.
> >
> > I think what happens here is that we have the A31 I've tested these
> > patches on is a quad-core SoC. As such, the device tree has 4 CPUs
> > declared. However, we don't have any SMP support for it now. So we end
> > up having 4 cpus set as possible, and only one online (the boot cpu),
> > which isn't working.
> 
> Can you explain more why it isn't working? Is the timer being rejected
> in favor of another timer?

Hmm, right, I forgot it, sorry about that.

The timers actually seem to not be working at all. I get stuck at the
delay loop calibration.

I'm away from my hardware right now, so I couldn't debug it further, but
reverting to using cpumask_of(0) makes the kernel boot flawlessly.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ