[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1381533451-29018-11-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 16:17:28 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, darren@...art.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
sbw@....edu, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 11/14] bridge/br_mdb: Apply ACCESS_ONCE() to avoid sparse false positive
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
The sparse checking for rcu_assign_pointer() was recently upgraded
to reject non-__kernel address spaces. This also rejects __rcu,
which is almost always the right thing to do. However, the use in
__br_mdb_del() is legitimate: They are assigning a pointer to an element
from an RCU-protected list, and all elements of this list are already
visible to caller.
This commit therefore silences these false positives by laundering
the pointers using ACCESS_ONCE() as suggested by Eric Dumazet and Josh
Triplett.
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
---
net/bridge/br_mdb.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_mdb.c b/net/bridge/br_mdb.c
index 85a09bb5ca51..de7197ba8695 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_mdb.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_mdb.c
@@ -447,7 +447,7 @@ static int __br_mdb_del(struct net_bridge *br, struct br_mdb_entry *entry)
if (p->port->state == BR_STATE_DISABLED)
goto unlock;
- rcu_assign_pointer(*pp, p->next);
+ ACCESS_ONCE(*pp) = p->next; /* OK: Both --rcu and visible. */
hlist_del_init(&p->mglist);
del_timer(&p->timer);
call_rcu_bh(&p->rcu, br_multicast_free_pg);
--
1.8.1.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists