lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5257CA23.9000501@huawei.com>
Date:	Fri, 11 Oct 2013 17:51:31 +0800
From:	Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 09/12] cpuset: refactor cpuset_hotplug_update_tasks()

We mix the handling for both sane_behavior and !sane_behavior in the
same function, and it's quite messy, so split into two functions.

Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
---
 kernel/cpuset.c | 118 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c
index e47115e..cefc8f4 100644
--- a/kernel/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
@@ -2186,6 +2186,65 @@ static void remove_tasks_in_empty_cpuset(struct cpuset *cs)
 	}
 }
 
+static void hotplug_update_tasks_insane(struct cpuset *cs,
+					struct cpumask *off_cpus,
+					nodemask_t *off_mems)
+{
+	bool is_empty;
+
+	mutex_lock(&callback_mutex);
+	cpumask_andnot(cs->cpus_allowed, cs->cpus_allowed, off_cpus);
+	cpumask_andnot(cs->effective_cpus, cs->effective_cpus, off_cpus);
+	nodes_andnot(cs->mems_allowed, cs->mems_allowed, *off_mems);
+	nodes_andnot(cs->effective_mems, cs->effective_mems, *off_mems);
+	mutex_unlock(&callback_mutex);
+
+	/*
+	 * Don't call update_tasks_cpumask() if the cpuset becomes empty,
+	 * as the tasks will be migratecd to an ancestor.
+	 */
+	if (!cpumask_empty(off_cpus) && !cpumask_empty(cs->cpus_allowed))
+		update_tasks_cpumask(cs, NULL);
+	if (!nodes_empty(*off_mems) && !nodes_empty(cs->mems_allowed))
+		update_tasks_nodemask(cs, NULL);
+
+	is_empty = cpumask_empty(cs->cpus_allowed) ||
+		   nodes_empty(cs->mems_allowed);
+
+	mutex_unlock(&cpuset_mutex);
+
+	/*
+	 * Move tasks to the nearest ancestor with execution resources,
+	 * This is full cgroup operation which will also call back into
+	 * cpuset. Should be done outside any lock.
+	 */
+	if (is_empty)
+		remove_tasks_in_empty_cpuset(cs);
+
+	mutex_lock(&cpuset_mutex);
+}
+
+static void hotplug_update_tasks_sane(struct cpuset *cs,
+				      struct cpumask *off_cpus,
+				      nodemask_t *off_mems)
+{
+	mutex_lock(&callback_mutex);
+	cpumask_andnot(cs->effective_cpus, cs->effective_cpus, off_cpus);
+	if (cpumask_empty(cs->effective_cpus))
+		cpumask_copy(cs->effective_cpus,
+			     parent_cs(cs)->effective_cpus);
+
+	nodes_andnot(cs->effective_mems, cs->effective_mems, *off_mems);
+	if (nodes_empty(cs->effective_mems))
+		cs->effective_mems = parent_cs(cs)->effective_mems;
+	mutex_unlock(&callback_mutex);
+
+	if (!cpumask_empty(off_cpus))
+		update_tasks_cpumask(cs, NULL);
+	if (!nodes_empty(*off_mems))
+		update_tasks_nodemask(cs, NULL);
+}
+
 /**
  * cpuset_hotplug_update_tasks - update tasks in a cpuset for hotunplug
  * @cs: cpuset in interest
@@ -2198,9 +2257,6 @@ static void cpuset_hotplug_update_tasks(struct cpuset *cs)
 {
 	static cpumask_t off_cpus;
 	static nodemask_t off_mems;
-	bool is_empty;
-	bool sane = cgroup_sane_behavior(cs->css.cgroup);
-
 retry:
 	wait_event(cpuset_attach_wq, cs->attach_in_progress == 0);
 
@@ -2218,60 +2274,12 @@ retry:
 	cpumask_andnot(&off_cpus, cs->effective_cpus, top_cpuset.effective_cpus);
 	nodes_andnot(off_mems, cs->effective_mems, top_cpuset.effective_mems);
 
-	mutex_lock(&callback_mutex);
-	if (!sane)
-		cpumask_andnot(cs->cpus_allowed, cs->cpus_allowed, &off_cpus);
-
-	/* Inherit the effective mask of the parent, if it becomes empty. */
-	cpumask_andnot(cs->effective_cpus, cs->effective_cpus, &off_cpus);
-	if (sane && cpumask_empty(cs->effective_cpus))
-		cpumask_copy(cs->effective_cpus, parent_cs(cs)->effective_cpus);
-	mutex_unlock(&callback_mutex);
-
-	/*
-	 * If sane_behavior flag is set, we need to update tasks' cpumask
-	 * for empty cpuset to take on ancestor's cpumask. Otherwise, don't
-	 * call update_tasks_cpumask() if the cpuset becomes empty, as
-	 * the tasks in it will be migrated to an ancestor.
-	 */
-	if ((sane && cpumask_empty(cs->cpus_allowed)) ||
-	    (!cpumask_empty(&off_cpus) && !cpumask_empty(cs->cpus_allowed)))
-		update_tasks_cpumask(cs, NULL);
-
-	mutex_lock(&callback_mutex);
-	if (!sane)
-		nodes_andnot(cs->mems_allowed, cs->mems_allowed, off_mems);
-
-	/* Inherit the effective mask of the parent, if it becomes empty */
-	nodes_andnot(cs->effective_mems, cs->effective_mems, off_mems);
-	if (sane && nodes_empty(cs->effective_mems))
-		cs->effective_mems = parent_cs(cs)->effective_mems;
-	mutex_unlock(&callback_mutex);
-
-	/*
-	 * If sane_behavior flag is set, we need to update tasks' nodemask
-	 * for empty cpuset to take on ancestor's nodemask. Otherwise, don't
-	 * call update_tasks_nodemask() if the cpuset becomes empty, as
-	 * the tasks in it will be migratd to an ancestor.
-	 */
-	if ((sane && nodes_empty(cs->mems_allowed)) ||
-	    (!nodes_empty(off_mems) && !nodes_empty(cs->mems_allowed)))
-		update_tasks_nodemask(cs, NULL);
-
-	is_empty = cpumask_empty(cs->cpus_allowed) ||
-		nodes_empty(cs->mems_allowed);
+	if (cgroup_sane_behavior(cs->css.cgroup))
+		hotplug_update_tasks_sane(cs, &off_cpus, &off_mems);
+	else
+		hotplug_update_tasks_insane(cs, &off_cpus, &off_mems);
 
 	mutex_unlock(&cpuset_mutex);
-
-	/*
-	 * If sane_behavior flag is set, we'll keep tasks in empty cpusets.
-	 *
-	 * Otherwise move tasks to the nearest ancestor with execution
-	 * resources.  This is full cgroup operation which will
-	 * also call back into cpuset.  Should be done outside any lock.
-	 */
-	if (!sane && is_empty)
-		remove_tasks_in_empty_cpuset(cs);
 }
 
 /**
-- 
1.8.0.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ