[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131011104419.GE14732@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 11:44:20 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
"linux390@...ibm.com" <linux390@...ibm.com>,
"linux-s390@...r.kernel.org" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: include: asm: atomic.h: use 'unsigned int'
and 'atomic_t' instead of 'unsigned long' for atomic_clear_mask()
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 02:18:26AM +0100, Chen Gang wrote:
> On 10/10/2013 10:23 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 12:03:52PM +0100, Chen Gang wrote:
> >> BTW: do arm64 need atomic_clear_mask()?
> >
> > No. Neither ARM nor arm64 need this function.
>
> OK, thank you for your confirmation.
>
> Hmm... can we remove atomic_clear_mask() from ARM and arm64? (in my
> opinion, if not need, better to remove it).
Yes!
I mentioned this a few times already...
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists