[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1381488130-30235-52-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 11:41:21 +0100
From: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
Michio Honda <micchie@....wide.ad.jp>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 051/100] net: sctp: fix smatch warning in sctp_send_asconf_del_ip
3.5.7.23 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
commit 88362ad8f9a6cea787420b57cc27ccacef000dbe upstream.
This was originally reported in [1] and posted by Neil Horman [2], he said:
Fix up a missed null pointer check in the asconf code. If we don't find
a local address, but we pass in an address length of more than 1, we may
dereference a NULL laddr pointer. Currently this can't happen, as the only
users of the function pass in the value 1 as the addrcnt parameter, but
its not hot path, and it doesn't hurt to check for NULL should that ever
be the case.
The callpath from sctp_asconf_mgmt() looks okay. But this could be triggered
from sctp_setsockopt_bindx() call with SCTP_BINDX_REM_ADDR and addrcnt > 1
while passing all possible addresses from the bind list to SCTP_BINDX_REM_ADDR
so that we do *not* find a single address in the association's bind address
list that is not in the packed array of addresses. If this happens when we
have an established association with ASCONF-capable peers, then we could get
a NULL pointer dereference as we only check for laddr == NULL && addrcnt == 1
and call later sctp_make_asconf_update_ip() with NULL laddr.
BUT: this actually won't happen as sctp_bindx_rem() will catch such a case
and return with an error earlier. As this is incredably unintuitive and error
prone, add a check to catch at least future bugs here. As Neil says, its not
hot path. Introduced by 8a07eb0a5 ("sctp: Add ASCONF operation on the
single-homed host").
[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-sctp/msg02132.html
[2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-sctp/msg02133.html
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
Cc: Michio Honda <micchie@....wide.ad.jp>
Acked-By: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
---
net/sctp/socket.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
index 7e40284..d01802a 100644
--- a/net/sctp/socket.c
+++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
@@ -814,6 +814,9 @@ static int sctp_send_asconf_del_ip(struct sock *sk,
goto skip_mkasconf;
}
+ if (laddr == NULL)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
/* We do not need RCU protection throughout this loop
* because this is done under a socket lock from the
* setsockopt call.
--
1.8.3.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists