| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAGG-pURd2cm=2rYGPedeyC+r--sgMuQTvZ1_vOYho=vZbb21hg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 10:19:40 -0300
From: Geyslan Gregório Bem <geyslan@...il.com>
To: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@...ntdisaster.de>
Cc: chris.mason@...ionio.com, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Josef Bacik <jbacik@...ionio.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
kernel-br <kernel-br@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] btrfs: Fix memory leakage in the tree-log.c
2013/10/11 Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@...ntdisaster.de>:
> On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 19:11:22 -0300, Geyslan G. Bem wrote:
>> In add_inode_ref() function:
>>
>> Initializes local pointers.
>>
>> Reduces the logical condition with the __add_inode_ref() return
>> value by using only one 'goto out'.
>>
>> Centralizes the exiting, ensuring the freeing of all used memory.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Geyslan G. Bem <geyslan@...il.com>
>
> The patch looks correct to me, but there are some nitpicking style issues.
>
>
>> ---
>> fs/btrfs/tree-log.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c b/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
>> index 79f057c..beb41b0 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
>> @@ -1113,11 +1113,11 @@ static noinline int add_inode_ref(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>> struct extent_buffer *eb, int slot,
>> struct btrfs_key *key)
>> {
>> - struct inode *dir;
>> - struct inode *inode;
>> + struct inode *dir = NULL;
>> + struct inode *inode = NULL;
>> unsigned long ref_ptr;
>> unsigned long ref_end;
>> - char *name;
>> + char *name = NULL;
>> int namelen;
>> int ret;
>> int search_done = 0;
>> @@ -1150,13 +1150,15 @@ static noinline int add_inode_ref(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>> * care of the rest
>> */
>> dir = read_one_inode(root, parent_objectid);
>> - if (!dir)
>> - return -ENOENT;
>> + if (!dir) {
>> + ret = -ENOENT;
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>>
>> inode = read_one_inode(root, inode_objectid);
>> if (!inode) {
>> - iput(dir);
>> - return -EIO;
>> + ret = -EIO;
>> + goto out;
>> }
>>
>> while (ref_ptr < ref_end) {
>> @@ -1169,14 +1171,17 @@ static noinline int add_inode_ref(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>> */
>> if (!dir)
>> dir = read_one_inode(root, parent_objectid);
>> - if (!dir)
>> - return -ENOENT;
>> + if (!dir) {
>> + ret = -ENOENT;
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> } else {
>> ret = ref_get_fields(eb, ref_ptr, &namelen, &name,
>> &ref_index);
>> }
>> if (ret)
>> - return ret;
>> + goto out;
>> +
>
> This additional empty line is not required, we would have two empty
> lines in a row.
Ok, I'll remove it.
>
>
>>
>> /* if we already have a perfect match, we're done */
>> if (!inode_in_dir(root, path, btrfs_ino(dir), btrfs_ino(inode),
>> @@ -1196,12 +1201,12 @@ static noinline int add_inode_ref(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>> parent_objectid,
>> ref_index, name, namelen,
>> &search_done);
>> - if (ret == 1) {
>> - ret = 0;
>> +
>
> This empty line is also not required. You know, this hurts on regular
> 80x24 terminals. Do you get more than 24 lines on your display?
> I thought there was a rule for this in Documentation/CodingStyle, but
> there isn't. Therefore it's up to you. But the two empty lines above are
> definitely not wanted.
>
Yes, I get more than 24 lines. But no problem, I know about the Coding Style.
This issue will be fixed.
>
>> + if (ret) {
>> + if (ret == 1)
>> + ret--;
>
> I don't see a reason to change the "ret = 0" to a "ret--", this is not
> an optimization and makes the code less readable.
>
Really. Using -O2 the code is equal. I'll redo to "ret = 0;" with the
new conditional scope.
>
>> goto out;
>> }
>> - if (ret)
>> - goto out;
>> }
>>
>> /* insert our name */
>> @@ -1215,6 +1220,8 @@ static noinline int add_inode_ref(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>>
>> ref_ptr = (unsigned long)(ref_ptr + ref_struct_size) + namelen;
>> kfree(name);
>> + name = NULL;
>> +
>
> Another empty line which is not required for the purpose of this patch.
Ok, it'll be removed.
>
>
>> if (log_ref_ver) {
>> iput(dir);
>> dir = NULL;
>> @@ -1225,6 +1232,7 @@ static noinline int add_inode_ref(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>> ret = overwrite_item(trans, root, path, eb, slot, key);
>> out:
>> btrfs_release_path(path);
>> + kfree(name);
>> iput(dir);
>> iput(inode);
>> return ret;
>>
>
>
Thank you again.
Geyslan G. Bem
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists