[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131011155454.GA32305@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 08:54:54 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
toshi.kani@...com, sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Release device_hotplug_lock when store_mem_state returns
EINVAL
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 03:36:25PM +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
> When inserting a wrong value to /sys/devices/system/memory/memoryX/state file,
> following messages are shown. And device_hotplug_lock is never released.
>
> ================================================
> [ BUG: lock held when returning to user space! ]
> 3.12.0-rc4-debug+ #3 Tainted: G W
> ------------------------------------------------
> bash/6442 is leaving the kernel with locks still held!
> 1 lock held by bash/6442:
> #0: (device_hotplug_lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8146cbb5>] lock_device_hotplug_sysfs+0x15/0x50
>
> This issue was introdued by commit fa2be40 (drivers: base: use standard
> device online/offline for state change).
>
> This patch releases device_hotplug_lcok when store_mem_state returns EINVAL.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
> CC: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
> CC: Seth Jennings <sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Is this needed in 3.12-final, and possibly older kernel releases as well
(3.10, 3.11, etc.)? Or is it ok for 3.13?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists