linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] gpio: davinci: add OF support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdYSCgs9eiN4crqXYQrbU71H-6-u04C2a5OeHHu4Da3big@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 11 Oct 2013 18:21:44 +0200
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Prabhakar Lad <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
Cc:	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	DLOS <davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	LDOC <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	LAK <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] gpio: davinci: add OF support

On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Prabhakar Lad
<prabhakar.csengg@...il.com> wrote:
> On 10/11/13, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Prabhakar Lad
>> <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com> wrote:
>>> On 10/11/13, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Prabhakar Lad
>>>> <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>> +- ti,davinci-gpio-irq-base: Base from where GPIO interrupt numbering
>>>>> starts.
>>>>
>>>> What is this?
>>>>
>>>> If I have ever ACKed this I have been drunk. I take it back.
>>>>
>>> here is the ACK https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2721181/
>>
>> And as suspected that version of the patch did not contain
>> this strange node property.
>>
> The property did exist in the patch 'intc_irq_num', I just renamed
> it and gave a proper description to it.

Hm yeah you're right ... I didn't understand what it was actually
doing until I saw the revised documentation, I though it was
stating the number of (hardware) IRQs, but it was stating the
Linux-internal offset.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/