[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAVeFu+K6HvQTMOQqMbZPUD_C3nQ1MvYju1BGUOWPYJjQEpTjg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 09:42:29 -0700
From: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>,
Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] gpiolib / ACPI: move acpi_gpiochip_free_interrupts
next to the request function
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:00 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Mika Westerberg
> <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>> It makes more sense to have these functions close to each other. No
>> functional changes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
>> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> So I've applied this first patch, and I'm just waiting for Alexandre's
> ACK on the remaining patches concerning gpiod so we get this
> 100% right.
I think I'm ok with Mika's patches, however I need to send you a new
version of gpiod. I wanted to finish documentation first, but maybe
that can come slightly after so you can at least go ahead with both
series?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists