linux-kernel - [ 105/135] ib_srpt: always set response for task management

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20131011193956.678776463@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Fri, 11 Oct 2013 12:39:46 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@...fitbricks.com>,
	Nicholas Bellinger <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
Subject: [ 105/135] ib_srpt: always set response for task management

3.11-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@...fitbricks.com>

commit c807f64340932e19f0d2ac9b30c8381e1f60663a upstream.

The SRP specification requires:

  "Response data shall be provided in any SRP_RSP response that is sent in
   response to an SRP_TSK_MGMT request (see 6.7). The information in the
   RSP_CODE field (see table 24) shall indicate the completion status of
   the task management function."

So fix this to avoid the SRP initiator interprets task management functions
that succeeded as failed.

Signed-off-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@...fitbricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c |   10 ++++------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c
@@ -1588,7 +1588,7 @@ static int srpt_build_tskmgmt_rsp(struct
 	int resp_data_len;
 	int resp_len;
 
-	resp_data_len = (rsp_code == SRP_TSK_MGMT_SUCCESS) ? 0 : 4;
+	resp_data_len = 4;
 	resp_len = sizeof(*srp_rsp) + resp_data_len;
 
 	srp_rsp = ioctx->ioctx.buf;
@@ -1600,11 +1600,9 @@ static int srpt_build_tskmgmt_rsp(struct
 				    + atomic_xchg(&ch->req_lim_delta, 0));
 	srp_rsp->tag = tag;
 
-	if (rsp_code != SRP_TSK_MGMT_SUCCESS) {
-		srp_rsp->flags |= SRP_RSP_FLAG_RSPVALID;
-		srp_rsp->resp_data_len = cpu_to_be32(resp_data_len);
-		srp_rsp->data[3] = rsp_code;
-	}
+	srp_rsp->flags |= SRP_RSP_FLAG_RSPVALID;
+	srp_rsp->resp_data_len = cpu_to_be32(resp_data_len);
+	srp_rsp->data[3] = rsp_code;
 
 	return resp_len;
 }


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/