| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 12:39:57 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@...sung.com>
Subject: [ 116/135] ACPI / IPMI: Fix atomic context requirement of ipmi_msg_handler()
3.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>
commit 06a8566bcf5cf7db9843a82cde7a33c7bf3947d9 upstream.
This patch fixes the issues indicated by the test results that
ipmi_msg_handler() is invoked in atomic context.
BUG: scheduling while atomic: kipmi0/18933/0x10000100
Modules linked in: ipmi_si acpi_ipmi ...
CPU: 3 PID: 18933 Comm: kipmi0 Tainted: G AW 3.10.0-rc7+ #2
Hardware name: QCI QSSC-S4R/QSSC-S4R, BIOS QSSC-S4R.QCI.01.00.0027.070120100606 07/01/2010
ffff8838245eea00 ffff88103fc63c98 ffffffff814c4a1e ffff88103fc63ca8
ffffffff814bfbab ffff88103fc63d28 ffffffff814c73e0 ffff88103933cbd4
0000000000000096 ffff88103fc63ce8 ffff88102f618000 ffff881035c01fd8
Call Trace:
<IRQ> [<ffffffff814c4a1e>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b
[<ffffffff814bfbab>] __schedule_bug+0x46/0x54
[<ffffffff814c73e0>] __schedule+0x83/0x59c
[<ffffffff81058853>] __cond_resched+0x22/0x2d
[<ffffffff814c794b>] _cond_resched+0x14/0x1d
[<ffffffff814c6d82>] mutex_lock+0x11/0x32
[<ffffffff8101e1e9>] ? __default_send_IPI_dest_field.constprop.0+0x53/0x58
[<ffffffffa09e3f9c>] ipmi_msg_handler+0x23/0x166 [ipmi_si]
[<ffffffff812bf6e4>] deliver_response+0x55/0x5a
[<ffffffff812c0fd4>] handle_new_recv_msgs+0xb67/0xc65
[<ffffffff81007ad1>] ? read_tsc+0x9/0x19
[<ffffffff814c8620>] ? _raw_spin_lock_irq+0xa/0xc
[<ffffffffa09e1128>] ipmi_thread+0x5c/0x146 [ipmi_si]
...
Also Tony Camuso says:
We were getting occasional "Scheduling while atomic" call traces
during boot on some systems. Problem was first seen on a Cisco C210
but we were able to reproduce it on a Cisco c220m3. Setting
CONFIG_LOCKDEP and LOCKDEP_SUPPORT to 'y' exposed a lockdep around
tx_msg_lock in acpi_ipmi.c struct acpi_ipmi_device.
=================================
[ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
2.6.32-415.el6.x86_64-debug-splck #1
---------------------------------
inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage.
ksoftirqd/3/17 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE1:SE0] takes:
(&ipmi_device->tx_msg_lock){+.?...}, at: [<ffffffff81337a27>] ipmi_msg_handler+0x71/0x126
{SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at:
[<ffffffff810ba11c>] __lock_acquire+0x63c/0x1570
[<ffffffff810bb0f4>] lock_acquire+0xa4/0x120
[<ffffffff815581cc>] __mutex_lock_common+0x4c/0x400
[<ffffffff815586ea>] mutex_lock_nested+0x4a/0x60
[<ffffffff8133789d>] acpi_ipmi_space_handler+0x11b/0x234
[<ffffffff81321c62>] acpi_ev_address_space_dispatch+0x170/0x1be
The fix implemented by this change has been tested by Tony:
Tested the patch in a boot loop with lockdep debug enabled and never
saw the problem in over 400 reboots.
Reported-and-tested-by: Tony Camuso <tcamuso@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Cc: Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@...sung.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c | 24 ++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
#include <linux/ipmi.h>
#include <linux/device.h>
#include <linux/pnp.h>
+#include <linux/spinlock.h>
MODULE_AUTHOR("Zhao Yakui");
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("ACPI IPMI Opregion driver");
@@ -57,7 +58,7 @@ struct acpi_ipmi_device {
struct list_head head;
/* the IPMI request message list */
struct list_head tx_msg_list;
- struct mutex tx_msg_lock;
+ spinlock_t tx_msg_lock;
acpi_handle handle;
struct pnp_dev *pnp_dev;
ipmi_user_t user_interface;
@@ -147,6 +148,7 @@ static void acpi_format_ipmi_msg(struct
struct kernel_ipmi_msg *msg;
struct acpi_ipmi_buffer *buffer;
struct acpi_ipmi_device *device;
+ unsigned long flags;
msg = &tx_msg->tx_message;
/*
@@ -177,10 +179,10 @@ static void acpi_format_ipmi_msg(struct
/* Get the msgid */
device = tx_msg->device;
- mutex_lock(&device->tx_msg_lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&device->tx_msg_lock, flags);
device->curr_msgid++;
tx_msg->tx_msgid = device->curr_msgid;
- mutex_unlock(&device->tx_msg_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&device->tx_msg_lock, flags);
}
static void acpi_format_ipmi_response(struct acpi_ipmi_msg *msg,
@@ -242,6 +244,7 @@ static void ipmi_msg_handler(struct ipmi
int msg_found = 0;
struct acpi_ipmi_msg *tx_msg;
struct pnp_dev *pnp_dev = ipmi_device->pnp_dev;
+ unsigned long flags;
if (msg->user != ipmi_device->user_interface) {
dev_warn(&pnp_dev->dev, "Unexpected response is returned. "
@@ -250,7 +253,7 @@ static void ipmi_msg_handler(struct ipmi
ipmi_free_recv_msg(msg);
return;
}
- mutex_lock(&ipmi_device->tx_msg_lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&ipmi_device->tx_msg_lock, flags);
list_for_each_entry(tx_msg, &ipmi_device->tx_msg_list, head) {
if (msg->msgid == tx_msg->tx_msgid) {
msg_found = 1;
@@ -258,7 +261,7 @@ static void ipmi_msg_handler(struct ipmi
}
}
- mutex_unlock(&ipmi_device->tx_msg_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ipmi_device->tx_msg_lock, flags);
if (!msg_found) {
dev_warn(&pnp_dev->dev, "Unexpected response (msg id %ld) is "
"returned.\n", msg->msgid);
@@ -378,6 +381,7 @@ acpi_ipmi_space_handler(u32 function, ac
struct acpi_ipmi_device *ipmi_device = handler_context;
int err, rem_time;
acpi_status status;
+ unsigned long flags;
/*
* IPMI opregion message.
* IPMI message is firstly written to the BMC and system software
@@ -395,9 +399,9 @@ acpi_ipmi_space_handler(u32 function, ac
return AE_NO_MEMORY;
acpi_format_ipmi_msg(tx_msg, address, value);
- mutex_lock(&ipmi_device->tx_msg_lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&ipmi_device->tx_msg_lock, flags);
list_add_tail(&tx_msg->head, &ipmi_device->tx_msg_list);
- mutex_unlock(&ipmi_device->tx_msg_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ipmi_device->tx_msg_lock, flags);
err = ipmi_request_settime(ipmi_device->user_interface,
&tx_msg->addr,
tx_msg->tx_msgid,
@@ -413,9 +417,9 @@ acpi_ipmi_space_handler(u32 function, ac
status = AE_OK;
end_label:
- mutex_lock(&ipmi_device->tx_msg_lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&ipmi_device->tx_msg_lock, flags);
list_del(&tx_msg->head);
- mutex_unlock(&ipmi_device->tx_msg_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ipmi_device->tx_msg_lock, flags);
kfree(tx_msg);
return status;
}
@@ -457,7 +461,7 @@ static void acpi_add_ipmi_device(struct
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ipmi_device->head);
- mutex_init(&ipmi_device->tx_msg_lock);
+ spin_lock_init(&ipmi_device->tx_msg_lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ipmi_device->tx_msg_list);
ipmi_install_space_handler(ipmi_device);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists