linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Fix for bcache regression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131011023811.GA19050@kmo>
Date:	Thu, 10 Oct 2013 19:38:11 -0700
From:	Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com>
To:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for bcache regression

On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 08:23:13PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10 2013, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > Linus, please apply - the last fix in the bugfix series I sent you had an
> > embarassing screwup...
> > 
> > For 3.13, shall I start sending you pull requests directly?
> 
> Sorry I dropped the ball on that one, it's the first time ever I've
> missed a deadline. It's being ramped up again, kernel time will be
> plenty again shortly.

No worries, I've been behind on plenty of stuff too and wouldn't have
much room to complain :)

Probably best that the giant pull ended up waiting a bit longer anyways
with the bugs I've still been fixing. Anyways, bcache is self contained
enough I doubt it really matters, so whatever the two of you prefer is
fine by me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/