linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 00/77] Re-design MSI/MSI-X interrupts enablement pattern

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52585FB3.7080508@start.ca>
Date:	Fri, 11 Oct 2013 16:29:39 -0400
From:	Mark Lord <kernel@...rt.ca>
To:	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...hat.com>
CC:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	Andy King <acking@...are.com>, Jon Mason <jon.mason@...el.com>,
	Matt Porter <mporter@...nel.crashing.org>,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux390@...ibm.com,
	linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, iss_storagedev@...com,
	linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-driver@...gic.com,
	Solarflare linux maintainers <linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com>,
	"VMware, Inc." <pv-drivers@...are.com>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 00/77] Re-design MSI/MSI-X interrupts enablement pattern

On 13-10-11 04:41 AM, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 07:17:18PM -0400, Mark Lord wrote:
>> Just to help us all understand "the loop" issue..
>>
>> Here's an example of driver code which uses the existing MSI-X interfaces,
>> for a device which can work with either 16, 8, 4, 2, or 1 MSI-X interrupt.
>> This is from a new driver I'm working on right now:
..
> Now, this is a loop-free alternative:
> 
> static int xx_alloc_msix_irqs(struct xx_dev *dev, int nvec)
> {
> 	nvec = roundup_pow_of_two(nvec);	/* assume 0 > nvec <= 16 */
> 
> 	xx_disable_all_irqs(dev);
> 
> 	pci_lock_msi(dev->pdev);
> 
> 	rc = pci_get_msix_limit(dev->pdev, nvec);
> 	if (rc < 0)
> 		goto err;
> 
> 	nvec = min(nvec, rc);		/* if limit is more than requested */
> 	nvec = rounddown_pow_of_two(nvec);	/* (a) */
> 
> 	xx_prep_for_msix_vectors(dev, nvec);
> 
> 	rc = pci_enable_msix(dev->pdev, dev->irqs, nvec);	/* (b)	*/
> 	if (rc < 0)
> 		goto err;
> 
> 	pci_unlock_msi(dev->pdev);
> 
> 	dev->num_vectors = nvec;		/* (b) */
> 	return 0;
> 
> err:
> 	pci_unlock_msi(dev->pdev);
> 
>         kerr(dev->name, "pci_enable_msix() failed, err=%d", rc);
>         dev->num_vectors = 0;
>         return rc;
> }

That would still need a loop, to handle the natural race between
the calls to pci_get_msix_limit() and pci_enable_msix() -- the driver and device
can and should fall back to a smaller number of vectors when pci_enable_msix() fails.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/