[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131012144057.GA2675@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 16:40:57 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: lockdep: testing '0' where '\0' intended?
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 01:06:03AM +0200, Roel Kluin wrote:
> Not entirely sure about the assembly part, but shouldn't it...
> --------
> Test for the nul character rather than the '0' (== 0x30), in the
> __get_user_unknown() case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/kernel/lockdep_proc.c b/kernel/lockdep_proc.c
> index b2c71c5..71b3aba 100644
> --- a/kernel/lockdep_proc.c
> +++ b/kernel/lockdep_proc.c
> @@ -632,7 +632,7 @@ static ssize_t lock_stat_write(struct file *file,
> const char __user *buf,
> if (get_user(c, buf))
> return -EFAULT;
>
> - if (c != '0')
> + if (c != '\0')
No we really meant '0'. Its so that:
echo 0 > /proc/lock_stat
resets the stats.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists