linux-kernel - Re: [Question]should we not ignore the masked interrupt in regmap?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131012154005.GM2443@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Sat, 12 Oct 2013 16:40:05 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	yi zhang <yizhang.mrvl@...il.com>
Cc:	Yi Zhang <yizhang@...vell.com>, zhouqiao@...vell.com,
	zhangwm@...vell.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Question]should we not ignore the masked interrupt in regmap?

On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 08:50:57PM +0800, yi zhang wrote:

> As I understand it, this "init_ack_masked" is used in initialization
> (please correct me if I'm wrong);
> but if the sequence above happens not in the initialization, then what
> should we do to handle this?
> could you please give us advice?

Just do the same thing during masking.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)