| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 19:28:55 +0000 From: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com> To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com> CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: RE: [GIT PULL] x86 fixes Windows definitely uses the ACPI reboot vector. The problem with this is that, depending on what the ACPI reboot vector points to, it may also trigger some SMM code. Hitting the PCI reboot vector is likely to skip that in most cases, which results in us breaking a different set of systems that rely on SMM code to reconfigure the hardware to the expectations of the firmware entry point. The most likely cause of the problem that we're seeing here is that we're leaving the hardware in a state that isn't compatible with assumptions made by Dell's SMM code. We've certainly seen that some previous Dell machines have made incorrect assumptions about VT-d, which probably means that we should be destroying that state before reboot. David Woodhouse had been looking into that - I don't know whether we ever actually merged anything to do so. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists