[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1381557246.3261.67.camel@scapa>
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 07:54:06 +0200
From: Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@...ian.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org>,
Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
DRI mailing list <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>,
Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@...onical.com>,
Lee Chun-Yi <joeyli.kernel@...il.com>,
Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
Igor Gnatenko <i.gnatenko.brain@...il.com>,
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Ben Jencks <ben@...ncks.net>,
Steven Newbury <steve@...wbury.org.uk>,
James Hogan <james@...anarts.com>,
Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>,
Joerg Platte <jplatte@...sa.net>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...rom.com>,
Martin Steigerwald <Martin@...htvoll.de>,
Jörg Otte <jrg.otte@...il.com>,
Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@...ine.de>,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.i>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] Fix Win8 backlight issue
On sam., 2013-10-12 at 01:27 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> If we are to use a Kconfig option, why don't we use one instead of rather than
> in addition to a command line option? Say, we have
> CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO_WIN8_WORKAROUND and if that is set, the code will work like
> the previous version of the Aaron's patchset (the one without
> video.use_native_backlight)?
Doesn't this mean user will have to rebuild distro kernel in order to
test behavior?
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (491 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists