lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131013160443.GB28927@kroah.com>
Date:	Sun, 13 Oct 2013 09:04:43 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ 00/39] 3.0.100-stable review

On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 05:52:17PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 03:14:05PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:34:44PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > --------------------------------
> > > NOTE: This is going to be the next-to-last 3.0.x release that I do.
> > >       You should be moving off to the 3.4.x or 3.10.x longterm kernels
> > >       by now, and not use the 3.0.x kernel unless you have to for some
> > >       reason.  If anyone has any problems with this, please let me know.
> > > --------------------------------
> > > 
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.100 release.
> > > There are 39 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > > 
> > > Responses should be made by Sun Oct 13 19:30:52 UTC 2013.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > 
> > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > 	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.0.100-rc1.gz
> > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > 
> > Due to a powerpc build breakage in -rc1, I've reverted one patch and
> > created a -rc2 patch:
> >  	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.0.100-rc2.gz
> > 
> 
> Build results for -rc2:
> 	total: 98 pass: 71 skipped: 16 fail: 11
> 
> qemu tests all pass.
> 
> Results are as expected.

Great, thanks for testing -rc2 and letting me know.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ