linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 08/23] mm/memblock: debug: don't free reserved array if !ARCH_DISCARD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131013195111.GB18075@htj.dyndns.org>
Date:	Sun, 13 Oct 2013 15:51:11 -0400
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>
Cc:	yinghai@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	grygorii.strashko@...com, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 08/23] mm/memblock: debug: don't free reserved array if
 !ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK

On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 05:58:51PM -0400, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
> 
> Now the Nobootmem allocator will always try to free memory allocated for
> reserved memory regions (free_low_memory_core_early()) without taking
> into to account current memblock debugging configuration
> (CONFIG_ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK and CONFIG_DEBUG_FS state).
> As result if:
>  - CONFIG_DEBUG_FS defined
>  - CONFIG_ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK not defined;
> -  reserved memory regions array have been resized during boot
> 
> then:
> - memory allocated for reserved memory regions array will be freed to
> buddy allocator;
> - debug_fs entry "sys/kernel/debug/memblock/reserved" will show garbage
> instead of state of memory reservations. like:
>    0: 0x98393bc0..0x9a393bbf
>    1: 0xff120000..0xff11ffff
>    2: 0x00000000..0xffffffff
> 
> Hence, do not free memory allocated for reserved memory regions if
> defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS) && !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK).
> 
> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>
> ---
>  mm/memblock.c |    4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
> index d903138..1bb2cc0 100644
> --- a/mm/memblock.c
> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> @@ -169,6 +169,10 @@ phys_addr_t __init_memblock get_allocated_memblock_reserved_regions_info(
>  	if (memblock.reserved.regions == memblock_reserved_init_regions)
>  		return 0;
>  

Please add comment explaining why the following test exists.  It's
pretty difficult to deduce the reason only from the code.

> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS) &&
> +	    !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK))
> +		return 0;
> +

Also, as this is another fix patch, can you please move this to the
head of the series?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/