[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <525A85D6.3090608@pobox.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2013 20:36:54 +0900
From: Shinya Kuribayashi <skuribay@...ox.com>
To: rmallon@...il.com, mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com,
Romain.Baeriswyl@...lis.com
CC: wsa@...-dreams.de, rob.herring@...xeda.com, pawel.moll@....com,
mark.rutland@....com, swarren@...dotorg.org,
ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, rob@...dley.net,
pierrick.hascoet@...lis.com, vgupta@...opsys.com,
christian.ruppert@...lis.com, chiau.ee.chew@...el.com,
khali@...ux-fr.org, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
romainba@...lis.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c designware make SCL and SDA falling time configurable
On 10/10/13 9:54 AM, Ryan Mallon wrote:
> On 09/10/13 18:55, Mika Westerberg wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 05:00:54PM +0200, Romain Baeriswyl wrote:
>>> @@ -307,15 +309,25 @@ int i2c_dw_init(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
>>>
>>> /* set standard and fast speed deviders for high/low periods */
>>>
>>> + if (dev->sda_falling_time)
>>> + sda_falling_time = dev->sda_falling_time;
>>> + else
>>> + sda_falling_time = 300; /* ns */
>>
>> I think this looks better:
>>
>> sda_falling_time = dev->sda_falling_time ? dev->sda_falling_time : 300;
>
> You can also use the gcc-ism, which is a bit more concise:
>
> sda_falling_time = dev->sda_falling_time ?: 300;
+1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists