[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131013125302.GB9286@neilslaptop.think-freely.org>
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2013 08:53:03 -0400
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sebastien.dugue@...l.net,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Run checksumming in parallel accross multiple alu's
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 07:21:24PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com> wrote:
>
> > Sébastien Dugué reported to me that devices implementing ipoib (which
> > don't have checksum offload hardware were spending a significant amount
> > of time computing checksums. We found that by splitting the checksum
> > computation into two separate streams, each skipping successive elements
> > of the buffer being summed, we could parallelize the checksum operation
> > accros multiple alus. Since neither chain is dependent on the result of
> > the other, we get a speedup in execution (on hardware that has multiple
> > alu's available, which is almost ubiquitous on x86), and only a
> > negligible decrease on hardware that has only a single alu (an extra
> > addition is introduced). Since addition in commutative, the result is
> > the same, only faster
>
> This patch should really come with measurement numbers: what performance
> increase (and drop) did you get on what CPUs.
>
> Thanks,
>
Sure, I can gather some stats for you. I'll post them later this week
Neil
> Ingo
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists