linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/14] sched: SCHED

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 14 Oct 2013 14:38:55 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
	mingo@...hat.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, oleg@...hat.com,
	fweisbec@...il.com, darren@...art.com, johan.eker@...csson.com,
	p.faure@...tech.ch, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	claudio@...dence.eu.com, michael@...rulasolutions.com,
	fchecconi@...il.com, tommaso.cucinotta@...up.it,
	nicola.manica@...i.unitn.it, luca.abeni@...tn.it,
	dhaval.giani@...il.com, hgu1972@...il.com,
	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, raistlin@...ux.it,
	insop.song@...il.com, liming.wang@...driver.com, jkacur@...hat.com,
	harald.gustafsson@...csson.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
	bruce.ashfield@...driver.com--no-chain-reply-to
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] sched: SCHED_DEADLINE v8


* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 12:43:32PM +0200, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> > 
> > here we go with a new version of the SCHED_DEADLINE patchset (v8). I know that
> > it has been a while since I released last version [1], but I thought not to
> > spam the mailing list with simple updates. Well... this IS basically an update
> > to 3.12-rc5, but it comes right before the next Kernel Summit and Real Time
> > Linux Workshop and, since I'll be present at both events, it is probably time
> > to fire-up the discussion again.
> 
> So I feel we should just merge this stuff already; [...]

Fully agreed - this has been going on for a long time and the patch-set 
has settled down nicely.

> [...] the only 'issue' I have is the cgroup abi muck. We clearly need a 
> bit more discussion on what/how we want things there but there are no 
> easy answers :/ So I'd say lets try this and see where we'll find 
> ourselves.

I'd suggest we leave out the cgroup ABI muck from the first round of 
upstream merge - do it in a second round, that will give it more 
attention.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/