[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <525C0A51.2080407@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 08:14:25 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>, mingo@...nel.org,
pjt@...gle.com, rjw@...k.pl, dirk.j.brandewie@...el.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, alex.shi@...aro.org,
preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, efault@....de, corbet@....net,
tglx@...utronix.de, catalin.marinas@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/7] sched: power: Remove power capacity hints for
kworker threads
On 10/14/2013 6:33 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 06:19:14PM +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
>> Removing power hints for kworker threads enables easier use of
>> workqueues in the power driver late callback. That would otherwise
>> lead to an endless loop unless it is prevented in the power driver.
>
> There's many kworker users; some of them actually consume lots of
> cputime. Therefore how did you come to the conclusion that excepting all
> users was the better choice of a little added complexity in the one
> place where it actually matters?
.. and likely only for a very few architectures
x86, and I suspect modern ARM, can change frequency synchronously.
(using an instruction or maybe two or three for ARM)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists