linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] sound/soc/atmel: don't use devm_pinctrl_get_select

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131014163753.GF2443@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 14 Oct 2013 17:37:53 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
	alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] sound/soc/atmel: don't use
 devm_pinctrl_get_select_default() in probe

On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 04:56:29PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:

> > Applied, thanks.  Please use subject lines appropriate to the subsystem.

> That's quite a nut to crack with a generated patch series running over
> the whole tree. I wonder if it is really worth the effort?

I think it's probably worth the effort to add something to put rules for
these things in MAINTAINERS, it'd cover 90% of cases.  If you're sending
only one of a big series with a subject line that won't pattern match
that's a good way to get stuff dropped on the floor.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)