linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] gpiolib / ACPI: move acpi_gpiochip_free

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAAVeFuK6Jm62VYG5n+T_odBBRSuftS3H0rmQx8+SDxjT28C-NQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 14 Oct 2013 09:55:26 -0700
From:	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
To:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>,
	Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] gpiolib / ACPI: move acpi_gpiochip_free_interrupts
 next to the request function

On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 11:58 PM, Linus Walleij
<linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:00 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Mika Westerberg
>>> <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It makes more sense to have these functions close to each other. No
>>>> functional changes.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
>>>> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>>>
>>> So I've applied this first patch, and I'm just waiting for Alexandre's
>>> ACK on the remaining patches concerning gpiod so we get this
>>> 100% right.
>>
>> I think I'm ok with Mika's patches, however I need to send you a new
>> version of gpiod. I wanted to finish documentation first, but maybe
>> that can come slightly after so you can at least go ahead with both
>> series?
>
> The important thing right now is to get it in a testable form I think?
> So that I can throw it at the autobuilder and it gets included into
> linux-next as that comes back online.
>
> So give me whatever you have ... BTW is this series dependent on
> yours to go in first? Sorry for not seeing the details here...

Yes it is. I have sent you the v2 of my series last Friday (+ one fix
to squash into 3/3).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/