| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 19:02:29 +0000 From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com> To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, tj@...nel.org, akpm@...uxfoundation.org, srostedt@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] percpu: Implement Preemption checks for __this_cpu operations V4 On Mon, 14 Oct 2013, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > Most kernel developers tend to use 'git send-email' to send patches to > > lkml, and that method is working pretty reliably. > > I always use quilt mail, it typically adds a reference to the 0/0 email > and ensures the time of each msg is one second ahead of the previous one > to ensure order is correct. Yes that I also what I expected to happen and what always happened in the past. > I've no idea how Christoph managed to wreck this, but normally quilt > mail DTRT (as opposed to git send-email which used to default to > endlessly deep threads -- got fixed in 1.6 or 1.7 or thereabouts). Well this is going through Amazon cloud email which may be wrecking things. Had a number of issues already with messages being delayed etc. I can try to revert to my home setup and see if that fixes things. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists