linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 14 (bcache)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131014202723.GQ2443@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 14 Oct 2013 21:27:23 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com>,
	linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 14 (bcache)

On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 11:58:10AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 10/14/13 07:48, Thierry Reding wrote:

> > Gained a few conflicts, but nothing too exciting. x86 and ARM default
> > configurations build fine. There were some build failures unrelated to

> Maybe you could build allmodconfig instead of a default config
> for more better coverage?  I am seeing lots of build problems.

I'd say in addition - if you look at the last tree I did it's got fixes
for all these tihngs I think.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)