[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <525C6170.1060901@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 23:26:08 +0200
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
oleg@...hat.com, fweisbec@...il.com, darren@...art.com,
johan.eker@...csson.com, p.faure@...tech.ch,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, claudio@...dence.eu.com,
michael@...rulasolutions.com, fchecconi@...il.com,
tommaso.cucinotta@...up.it, nicola.manica@...i.unitn.it,
luca.abeni@...tn.it, dhaval.giani@...il.com, hgu1972@...il.com,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, raistlin@...ux.it,
insop.song@...il.com, liming.wang@...driver.com, jkacur@...hat.com,
harald.gustafsson@...csson.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
bruce.ashfield@...driver.com--no-chain-reply-to
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/14] sched: SCHED_DEADLINE structures & implementation.
On 10/14/2013 01:51 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 12:43:35PM +0200, Juri Lelli wrote:
>> +static void set_cpus_allowed_dl(struct task_struct *p,
>> + const struct cpumask *new_mask)
>> +{
>> + int weight = cpumask_weight(new_mask);
>> +
>> + BUG_ON(!dl_task(p));
>> +
>> + cpumask_copy(&p->cpus_allowed, new_mask);
>> + p->dl.nr_cpus_allowed = weight;
>> +}
>
> This seems identical so the default in do_set_cpus_allowed(); can we
> leave this function out and use the default?
>
Another thing that is changed completely in next patch. Anyway, I removed it
from here too.
Thanks,
- Juri
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists