[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131014215047.GL4009@pd.tnic>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 23:50:47 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...il.com>
Cc: Chen Gong <gong.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-acpi <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Lance Ortiz <lance.ortiz@...com>,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] ACPI, APEI, CPER: Cleanup CPER memory error output
format
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 02:03:16PM -0700, Tony Luck wrote:
> Do you have a suggested mechanism for this disabling of dmesg?
Hmm, how about a 64-bit flag variable (we can use the remaining bits
for other stuff later) called x86_ras_flags which is private to
arch/x86/ras/core.c (a new file)...
[ btw, I'm thinking of something similar to efi's x86_efi_facility which we
nicely query with test_bit and set with set_bit and clear_bit, etc, etc ]
Also, look at arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c::efi_enabled() how it hides
the actual variable and we can do something similar so that eMCA and
other users like cper.c can do
apei_estatus_print_section:
if (!ras_tracepoint_enabled())
cper_print_mem(...)
We set the bit in x86_ras_flags from, say, debugfs, i.e., a userspace
tool sets it and from that moment on all RAS output is rerouted to the
trace event. I.e., the output for which there is a trace event...
How does that look like?
Purely hypothetical, of course, I might me missing something but it
looks ok from here. As always, the devil is in the detail, of course.
HTH.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists