lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <525C67B0.8020303@t-online.de>
Date:	Mon, 14 Oct 2013 23:52:48 +0200
From:	Knut Petersen <Knut_Petersen@...nline.de>
To:	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG 3.12.rc4] Oops: unable to handle kernel paging request during
 shutdown

On 14.10.2013 23:28, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 10:53:03AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> Hmm. No obvious ideas come to mind, but I'm adding more people to the cc.
>>
>> Clearly the wait_event_interruptible_timeout() in the RCU grace-period
>> thread causes this, but I'm not seeing why shutdown would trigger it.
>>
>> The code disassembles to
>>
>>     0: 85 db                 test   %ebx,%ebx
>>     2: 79 0c                 jns    0x10
>>     4: 81 e6 ff 00 00 00     and    $0xff,%esi
>>     a: 8d 44 f0 30           lea    0x30(%eax,%esi,8),%eax
>>     e: eb 0a                 jmp    0x1a
>>    10: c1 e9 1a             shr    $0x1a,%ecx
>>    13: 8d 84 c8 30 0e 00 00 lea    0xe30(%eax,%ecx,8),%eax
>>    1a: 8b 48 04             mov    0x4(%eax),%ecx
>>    1d: 89 50 04             mov    %edx,0x4(%eax)
>>    20: 89 02                 mov    %eax,(%edx)
>>    22: 89 4a 04             mov    %ecx,0x4(%edx)
>>    25:* 89 11                 mov    %edx,(%ecx) <-- trapping instruction
>>    27: 5b                   pop    %ebx
>>    28: 5e                   pop    %esi
>>    29: 5d                   pop    %ebp
>>    2a: c3                   ret
>>
>> so the oops is in the final
>>
>>          list_add_tail(&timer->entry, vec);
>>
>> where "%ecx" is "vec->prev" (f8c551f4). That looks like it might be a
>> perfectly valid pointer, but clearly it isn't (it's about 115M off the
>> top of virtual memory, I think that might be in the vmalloc area).
>>
>> So I'm *guessing* that something did a vfree() on some data structure
>> that contained active timers - and then later on the RCU thread ended
>> up being the next thing that tried to add a timer after the
>> now-non-existing one.
>>
>> And your other oopses do seem to have a similar pattern, even if their
>> actual oops is elsewhere. They oops in run_timer_softirq, also taking
>> a page fault in the 0xf9...... range, so it might well be a vmalloc
>> address there too.
>>
>> But I sure as hell can't start to guess what that would be.
>>
>> I'm wondering it CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS (and then
>> CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_FREE=y and CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_TIMERS=y) might
>> help catch this...

ACK
> I would also like to nominate CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD=y, which
> checks for invoking call_rcu() twice in a row on the same rcu_head.

ACK

I´ll run some tests with those debug parameters tomorrow.
> Any chance of a look at the .config file?

Attached.

>
> 							Thanx, Paul
>
>>                  Linus
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 4:07 AM, Knut Petersen
>> <Knut_Petersen@...nline.de> wrote:
>>> It愀 the third time in four months that I have to report a kernel Oops during
>>> shutdown.
>>> All of these Oopses seem somehow related to the timer subsystem, but they
>>> are
>>> not easily reproducible. As all this happens on two different machines, it愀
>>> unlikely
>>> that this mess is related to bad hardware.
>>>
>>> I clearly would appreciate any idea how to track this down.
>>>
>>> For the last two reports see:
>>>
>>> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1782575?#1782575
>>>
>>> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1744892?#1744892
>>>
>>> This time the kernel oopsed after systemd reported that target shutdown
>>> had been reached - see attached pdf for the full trace. To make it easier
>>> to find this problem a shortened call trace:
>>>
>>>
>>> Call Trace:
>>>      internal_add_timer
>>>      schedule_timeout
>>>      ? call_timer_fn
>>>      rcu_gp_kthread
>>>      __init_waitqueue_head
>>>      ? rcu_gp_fqs
>>>      kthread
>>>      ret_from_kernel_thread
>>>      ? __init_kthread_worker
>>>
>>> EIP: __internal_add_timer
>>>
>>> Hardware: AOpen i915GMm-hfs mobo with a Pentium-M Dothan and 2GB of RAM.
>>> Distribution: openSuSE 12.3
>>> Kernel: local 3.12.0-rc4-00127-g45877c4 is  kernel 9d05746 with my
>>> "Enforce 1 as lower limit for perf_event_max_sample_rate"
>>> patch applied.
>>>
>>> cu,
>>>   knut
>


View attachment "config-3.12.0-rc4" of type "text/plain" (92283 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ