[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1381790278.16896.2.camel@joe-AO722>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 15:37:58 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sebastien.dugue@...l.net, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Run checksumming in parallel accross multiple alu's
On Mon, 2013-10-14 at 15:18 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> attached patch brings much better results
>
> lpq83:~# ./netperf -H 7.7.8.84 -l 10 -Cc
> MIGRATED TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 7.7.8.84 () port 0 AF_INET
> Recv Send Send Utilization Service Demand
> Socket Socket Message Elapsed Send Recv Send Recv
> Size Size Size Time Throughput local remote local remote
> bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/s % S % S us/KB us/KB
>
> 87380 16384 16384 10.00 8043.82 2.32 5.34 0.566 1.304
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/csum-partial_64.c b/arch/x86/lib/csum-partial_64.c
[]
> @@ -68,7 +68,8 @@ static unsigned do_csum(const unsigned char *buff, unsigned len)
> zero = 0;
> count64 = count >> 3;
> while (count64) {
> - asm("addq 0*8(%[src]),%[res]\n\t"
> + asm("prefetch 5*64(%[src])\n\t"
Might the prefetch size be too big here?
0x140 is pretty big and is always multiple cachelines no?
> + "addq 0*8(%[src]),%[res]\n\t"
> "adcq 1*8(%[src]),%[res]\n\t"
> "adcq 2*8(%[src]),%[res]\n\t"
> "adcq 3*8(%[src]),%[res]\n\t"
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists