linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 14 (bcache)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131015084631.GK7856@ulmo.nvidia.com>
Date:	Tue, 15 Oct 2013 10:46:32 +0200
From:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com>,
	linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 14 (bcache)

On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 09:27:23PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 11:58:10AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On 10/14/13 07:48, Thierry Reding wrote:
> 
> > > Gained a few conflicts, but nothing too exciting. x86 and ARM default
> > > configurations build fine. There were some build failures unrelated to
> 
> > Maybe you could build allmodconfig instead of a default config
> > for more better coverage?  I am seeing lots of build problems.
> 
> I'd say in addition - if you look at the last tree I did it's got fixes
> for all these tihngs I think.

Strange, I didn't see any build fixes in it.

Oh wait, they were applied right after the merges that broke. I hadn't
checked for that.

Thierry

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped