[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALkWK0mWn2OKn4o4zLWz0Vck8DNT0kreq-c83oQkkx4LSO-42w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 16:44:36 +0530
From: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: use ansi versions of asm and volatile
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 04:16:26PM +0530, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
>> asm and volatile are provided for backward compatibility; use the ansi
>> versions __asm__ and __volatile__.
>>
>
> I won't object much to this; but I have to note that the entire kernel
> tree is loaded with the non-ansi variant and thus we're fairly certain
> it will continue working :-)
Oh well, atleast the definition of barrier() is consistent with the
one in linux/compiler-gcc.h.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists