[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131015131133.GC2402@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 15:11:33 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, oleg@...hat.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, darren@...art.com, johan.eker@...csson.com,
p.faure@...tech.ch, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
claudio@...dence.eu.com, michael@...rulasolutions.com,
fchecconi@...il.com, tommaso.cucinotta@...up.it,
nicola.manica@...i.unitn.it, luca.abeni@...tn.it,
dhaval.giani@...il.com, hgu1972@...il.com,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, raistlin@...ux.it,
insop.song@...il.com, liming.wang@...driver.com, jkacur@...hat.com,
harald.gustafsson@...csson.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
bruce.ashfield@...driver.com--no-chain-reply-to
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/14] sched: make dl_bw a sub-quota of rt_bw
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:25:22PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > Really, please make it _symmetric_ ...
> >
> > Single core systems are becoming a historic curiosity, should we
> > should justify every piece of extra complexity we add for them.
> >
> > So I'd rather see obvious SMP code where the UP case works fine too,
> > and _then_ maybe check a separate patch that adds the UP optimization,
> > with (object size) numbers proving that it's worth it, etc.
>
> That's a slightly larger task than it appears; the core scheduler code
> they rely on with smp doesn't exist on up.
>
> We can do this but we need to do it scheduler wide.
The scheduler has over 800 #ifdefs or similar preprocessor directives:
comet:~/tip> git grep '^#' kernel/sched/ | grep -v include | wc -l
855
I'd like to see this simplified a bit, _especially_ before we add new
complexity ...
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists