[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131015132718.GF9150@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 06:27:18 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Liu, Chuansheng" <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"Ingo Molnar (mingo@...nel.org)" <mingo@...nel.org>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"'linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org' (linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org)"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Wang, Xiaoming" <xiaoming.wang@...el.com>,
"Li, Zhuangzhi" <zhuangzhi.li@...el.com>
Subject: Re: Panic and page fault in loop during handling NMI backtrace
handler
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 03:17:59PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 06:06:59AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:59:15PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 05:48:37AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:37:17PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:18:53PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:01:04AM +0000, Liu, Chuansheng wrote:
> > > > > > > We meet one issue that during trigger all CPU backtrace, but during in the NMI handler arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace_handler,
> > > > > > > It hit the PAGE fault, then PAGE fault is in loop, at last the thread stack overflow, and system panic.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Anyone can give some help? Thanks.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Looks like we re-enter the fault several times. On x86-32, NMIs can
> > > > > > fault if they dereference vmalloc'ed area. I wonder if the module thing
> > > > > > we lookup in the NMI is stored on some vmalloc'ed area.
> > > > >
> > > > > IIRC modules are indeed allocated using vmalloc. See module_alloc()
> > > > > using vmalloc_exec()
> > > >
> > > > This might then be a module that uses call_rcu(), but which does not have
> > > > the needed rcu_barrier() in the module-exit function.
> > >
> > > I rather believe it's due to the lazy paging of vmalloc area in x86-32. We had issues
> > > like that in the past. For example that's the reason why we do an ad-hoc per-cpu
> > > allocation on callchain buffers in perf rather than using alloc_percpu() which might
> > > use vmalloc.
> >
> > I must defer to your greater experience with this type of bug.
>
> With some chances I'll be proved wrong. I hope, because that issue is not easily fixed.
Fair enough!
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists