[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131015161528.08c19e92@b012350-ux>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 16:15:28 +0200
From: Sébastien Dugué <sebastien.dugue@...l.net>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...hat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
<x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Run checksumming in parallel accross multiple
alu's
Hi Eric,
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 07:06:25 -0700
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-10-15 at 15:56 +0200, Sébastien Dugué wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 15:33:36 +0200
> > Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
> >
> > > > indeed, our typical workload is connected mode IPoIB on mlx4 QDR hardware
> > > > where one cannot benefit from hardware offloads.
> > >
> > > Is this with sendfile?
> >
> > Tests were done with iperf at the time without any extra funky options, and
> > looking at the code it looks like it does plain write() / recv() on the socket.
> >
>
> But the csum cost is both for sender and receiver ?
No, it was only on the receiver side that I noticed it.
>
> Please post the following :
>
> perf record -g "your iperf session"
>
> perf report | head -n 200
Sorry, but this is 3 years old stuff and I do not have the
setup anymore to reproduce.
Sébastien.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists