[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <525D525E.8010508@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 10:34:06 -0400
From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>
To: Chang <changxiangzhong@...il.com>, nhorman@...driver.com
CC: davem@...emloft.net, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: sctp: fix a cacc_saw_newack missetting issue
On 10/15/2013 10:27 AM, Chang wrote:
>
> On 10/15/2013 04:11 PM, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
>> On 10/14/2013 09:33 AM, Chang Xiangzhong wrote:
>>> For for each TSN t being newly acked (Not only cumulatively,
>>> but also SELECTIVELY) cacc_saw_newack should be set to 1.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Xiangzhong Chang <changxiangzhong@...il.com>
>>> ---
>>> net/sctp/outqueue.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>>> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/net/sctp/outqueue.c b/net/sctp/outqueue.c
>>> index 94df758..d86032b 100644
>>> --- a/net/sctp/outqueue.c
>>> +++ b/net/sctp/outqueue.c
>>> @@ -1398,6 +1398,27 @@ static void sctp_check_transmitted(struct
>>> sctp_outq *q,
>>> forward_progress = true;
>>> }
>>>
>>> + if (!tchunk->tsn_gap_acked) {
>>
>> You can remove this test since the block just above already performs
>> it. Just fold this code into the block above.
>>
>> -vlad
>>
> Sorry, I'm not sure if I fully understand you. There are code blocks
> which checking the tchunk->tsn_gap_acked. In addition, they check other
> states as well.
The flow is:
if (sctp_acked(sack, tsn)) {
...
if (transport) {
....
}
if (!tchunk->tsn_gap_acked) {
....
}
if (TSN_lte(tsn, sack_ctsn)) {
....
/* SFR-CACC ...
}
Since you are moving this up, you can simply re-use
the if (!tchunk->tsn_gap_acked) immediately above.
>>> + /*
>>> + * SFR-CACC algorithm:
>>> + * 2) If the SACK contains gap acks
>>> + * and the flag CHANGEOVER_ACTIVE is
>>> + * set the receiver of the SACK MUST
>>> + * take the following action:
>>> + *
>>> + * B) For each TSN t being acked that
>>> + * has not been acked in any SACK so
>>> + * far, set cacc_saw_newack to 1 for
>>> + * the destination that the TSN was
>>> + * sent to.
>>> + */
>>> + if (transport &&
>>> + sack->num_gap_ack_blocks &&
>>> + q->asoc->peer.primary_path->cacc.
>>> + changeover_active)
>>> + transport->cacc.cacc_saw_newack = 1;
^^^^
Don't need that many spaces...
-vlad
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> if (TSN_lte(tsn, sack_ctsn)) {
>>> /* RFC 2960 6.3.2 Retransmission Timer Rules
>>> *
>>> @@ -1411,27 +1432,6 @@ static void sctp_check_transmitted(struct
>>> sctp_outq *q,
>>> restart_timer = 1;
>>> forward_progress = true;
>>>
>>> - if (!tchunk->tsn_gap_acked) {
>>> - /*
>>> - * SFR-CACC algorithm:
>>> - * 2) If the SACK contains gap acks
>>> - * and the flag CHANGEOVER_ACTIVE is
>>> - * set the receiver of the SACK MUST
>>> - * take the following action:
>>> - *
>>> - * B) For each TSN t being acked that
>>> - * has not been acked in any SACK so
>>> - * far, set cacc_saw_newack to 1 for
>>> - * the destination that the TSN was
>>> - * sent to.
>>> - */
>>> - if (transport &&
>>> - sack->num_gap_ack_blocks &&
>>> - q->asoc->peer.primary_path->cacc.
>>> - changeover_active)
>>> - transport->cacc.cacc_saw_newack
>>> - = 1;
>>> - }
>>>
>>> list_add_tail(&tchunk->transmitted_list,
>>> &q->sacked);
>>>
>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists