[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131015161937.GU541@kernel.dk>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 10:19:37 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Hong zhi guo <honkiko@...il.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, vgoyal@...hat.com,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Hong Zhiguo <zhiguohong@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] blk-throttle: simplify logic by token bucket algorithm
On Tue, Oct 15 2013, Hong zhi guo wrote:
> Hi, Tejun,
>
> I did the test for 3 levels hierarchy. It works.
>
> Preparation
> ============
> 1) mount subsys blkio with "__DEVEL__sane_behavior"
> 2) Create 3 levels of directories under the blkio mount point:
> mkdir 1
> mkdir 1/2
> mkdir 1/2/3
> 3) start 3 bash sessions, write their PIDs into:
> 1/cgroup.procs
> 1/2/cgroup.procs
> 1/2/3/cgroup.procs
> 4) prepare 3 10MB files on sdb(ext4 fs)
>
> Note: in below hierarchy graph:
> "[50k]" means configured value for read_bps_device is 50kB/s
> "(50k)" means bandwidth reported by dd is 50kB/s
>
> Test A: 1 process throttled by ancestor group
> =============================================
> Hierarchy set-up:
> (echo "8:16 204800" > 1/blkio.throttle.read_bps_device)
> 1 [200k]
> `-- 2 [-]
> `-- 3 [-]
>
> dd within group 3:
> (drop cache then: dd if=10M-file-3 of=/dev/null)
> Result:
> 206kB/s (I did same test without the token-bucket patch, The
> result is 205kB/s)
>
> dd within group 2:
> (drop cache then: dd if=10M-file-2 of=/dev/null)
> Result:
> 205kB/s
>
>
> Test B: 3 processes in 3 levels of hierarchy
> =============================================
> Hierarchy set-up:
> echo "8:16 204800" > 1/blkio.throttle.read_bps_device
> echo "8:16 102400" > 1/2/blkio.throttle.read_bps_device
> echo "8:16 51200" > 1/2/3/blkio.throttle.read_bps_device
> 1 [200k]
> `-- 2 [100k]
> `-- 3 [50k]
> start 3 dd processes from 3 bash sessions
> (dd if=10M-file-x of=/dev/null)
> Result:
> 1 (103k)
> `-- 2 (51.9k)
> `-- 3 (51.4k)
Thanks for doing this testing, and the work to move to a token based
system. It makes a lot of sense. I've been investigating a token based
scheduler for blk-mq as well, since that could feasibly be made to scale
as well.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists