[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <525CBA1E.3030209@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 11:44:30 +0800
From: wangweidong <wangweidong1@...wei.com>
To: <davem@...emloft.net>, <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
<bfields@...ldses.org>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
Subject: [PACTH net-next] SUNRPC: remove an unnecessary if statement
If req allocated failed just goto out_free, no need to check the
'i < num_prealloc'. There is just code simplification, no
functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Wang Weidong <wangweidong1@...wei.com>
---
net/sunrpc/xprt.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprt.c b/net/sunrpc/xprt.c
index 095363e..a8e20de 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/xprt.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/xprt.c
@@ -1087,11 +1087,9 @@ struct rpc_xprt *xprt_alloc(struct net *net, size_t size,
for (i = 0; i < num_prealloc; i++) {
req = kzalloc(sizeof(struct rpc_rqst), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!req)
- break;
+ goto out_free;
list_add(&req->rq_list, &xprt->free);
}
- if (i < num_prealloc)
- goto out_free;
if (max_alloc > num_prealloc)
xprt->max_reqs = max_alloc;
else
-- 1.7.12
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists