[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131015165435.GA2777@naverao1-tp.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 22:24:35 +0530
From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Chen, Gong" <gong.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: tony.luck@...el.com, bp@...en8.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, m.chehab@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] ACPI / trace: Add trace interface for eMCA driver
On 2013/10/11 02:32AM, Chen Gong wrote:
> Use trace interface to elaborate all H/W error related
> information.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen, Gong <gong.chen@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
<snip>
> +TRACE_EVENT(extlog_mem_event,
> + TP_PROTO(u32 etype,
> + char *dimm_loc,
> + const uuid_le *fru_id,
> + char *fru_text,
> + u64 error_count,
> + u32 severity,
> + u64 phy_addr,
> + char *mem_loc),
[Adding Mauro...]
This looks very similar to the trace event I wrote a while back,
which was similar to the one provided by ghes_edac:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.pci/24616
Seems to me this has the same issues we previously discussed w.r.t
EDAC conflicts...
Regards,
Naveen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists