[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1381872280.22110.41.camel@joe-AO722>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 14:24:40 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Liu Chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] core: Convert printk_once to use DO_ONCE
On Tue, 2013-10-15 at 23:12 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:00:05PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-10-15 at 22:50 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > []
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/printk.h b/include/linux/printk.h
> > []
> > > @@ -252,14 +253,7 @@ extern asmlinkage void dump_stack(void) __cold;
> > >
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_PRINTK
> > > #define printk_once(fmt, ...) \
> > > -({ \
> > > - static bool __print_once; \
> > > - \
> > > - if (!__print_once) { \
> > > - __print_once = true; \
> > > - printk(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
> > > - } \
> > > -})
> > > + DO_ONCE(printk(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__));
> >
> > It's hard to believe the overhead is worth it.
>
> Which overhead?
The one you were proposing with xchg
Apparently the 1/3 series you submitted
didn't use it.
Given that it didn't, does the indirection
to DO_ONCE really help?
btw:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/21/300
Perhaps Alan's comment still applies:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/21/305
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists