linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: trace: Add tracepoint for the Inter Processor Interrupt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131015193346.292b252d@gandalf.local.home>
Date:	Tue, 15 Oct 2013 19:33:46 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc:	fweisbec@...il.com, mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, patches@...aro.org,
	linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, shaojie.sun@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: trace: Add tracepoint for the Inter Processor
 Interrupt

On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 08:26:15 +0200
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote:


> Mmh, I have a doubt here about the trace. I can remove the cpumask 
> because it is not used but in the other hand, it would be interesting to 
> have in the trace the cpumask of the recipient cpus for the IPI. 
> Unfortunately, I don't know how to convert this cpumask to a string 
> without using the cpumask_scnprintf which imply a more complex print trace.
> 
> Do you have some advices for that ?

What's wrong with recording the cpumask into the trace buffer and then
using cpumask_scnprintf() as output? We can update trace-cmd and
libtraceevent to handle that output too.

-- Steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/